Reaching
Uploaded: April 07, 2014
Canon 7D, Tamron 18-270mm lens, 1/125, f/7.1, ISO 250,
Exif: F Number: 7.1, Exposure Bias Value: -0.67, ExposureTime: 1/125 seconds, Flash: did not fire, compulsory flash mode, ISO: 250, White balance: Auto white balance, FocalLength: 18.00 mm, Model: Canon EOS 7D
Beth Spencer April 07, 2014
Sunset in Tucker County, I shot from a low position and I think it is straight, but it is on the side of the hill, not sure how to fix it or just leave it?Dale Hardin April 07, 2014
Beth, I think both are fine level wise and composition wise.However, even though this was sunset, the colors do not appear correct. The objects in the scene would certainly be affected by the low sun, but the sky does not reflect that light and is the give away.
I'd suggest, using these images as your source, apply a levels adjustment layer and lower the white slider on the green channel to about 230. This should give you an indication of where I believe the color should be. #11019555
Anthony L. Mancuso April 08, 2014
I agree with Dale about the color being off but I would address the issue by adjusting the temperature and tint sliders in ACR. Start by using the eyedropper tool and clicking on a a white area like the snow or clouds and tweak to your taste from there. #11019944Dale Hardin April 08, 2014
I agree with Tony's method. I just wanted a reference so you could see where I thought you'd see the desired result.The problem is, that in this case the snow is not white, so we as a viewer have no way of knowing how much to correct the WB. #11019987
Debbie E. Payne April 08, 2014
I agree with Tony on the method. Dale, are you suggesting that there should be less pink and lavender in the snow? Beth, if you try adjusting the luminance slider to the right for both the magenta and the blue in the Hue/Sat Sliders, it might seem less colored and more light.I think you live in a great place for sunsets. These are awesome. #11020139
Dale Hardin April 08, 2014
Debbie, I agreed with Tony's method also but my aim was to show an easy way for her to see what I'd envisioned.Yes, I was interested in less pink and lavender in the snow but not a loss of it. Using the hue/saturation method reduces the deep blue of the sky, so didn't go that way. #11020144
Beth Spencer April 08, 2014
Dale, you are right, there was too much of the pink and lavender in the sky. I used suggestions from you, Debbie and Tony and redid it. I think I am closer to what is should be. Then I thought about putting the before and after together and masking out what I didn't like but that didn't come close to looking right.Dale Hardin April 08, 2014
The vertical looks very good, Beth. On the horizontal, the colors look good but you've lost lot of details in the shadows. I've sent you an email that shows what my suggestion would have looked like. #11020205Jeff E Jensen April 08, 2014
Please stop posting pictures of snow. The end. :o) #11020241Stephen Shoff April 08, 2014
Your edits went a long ways in dealing with the color cast, and I won't get involved in that conversation.Your last post also came out way over sharpened. I suppose BP did that to you.
As to your question about the verticals, I'll refine my opinion from Dale's. Yes, the "verticals are straight", but it seems pretty clear that you were shooting uphill, probably somewhat wide angle. So you have a lot of convergence as evidenced by the trees along the border. Whether or not you correct that is often a matter of personal preference. For me, that is something I almost always correct. The way you fix it in Photoshop is under the Edit/transform menu with the "distort" option. You can "grab" each corner and shift them out and up or down until your reference lines, like the tree trunks, align with a grid. You can also stretch the image in either direction to correct proportions. In doing so, though, you often lose a large portion of the image, and that would be true in this case.
There are also controls on the camera adjustments tab in ACR (where you can set the lens used for automatic lens distortion correction and remove chromatic aberration) but I find them harder to use and less flexible than the CS6 controls.
In this image, I don't think you can correct it because there isn't enough room in the frame and you will lose the tops of the trees and the tree trunks will be right up against the edge of the image. #11020246
Beth Spencer April 09, 2014
Dale, Thanks I redid it and used your suggestions and do like it better. Stephen, you are right about trying to correct the convergence. I tried and did lose half the trees and the one crooked one on the left stayed crooked!Anthony L. Mancuso April 09, 2014
The edits look great Beth, but I have to say I strongly agree with Jeff's recommendation. I just raked leaves around the last foothold the snow had on my yard the other and it has finally succumbed to the above freezing temps today...I have no desire to see anymore of the stuff til Santa is due around again! #11020373Dale Hardin April 09, 2014
It was 97 degrees here yesterday. Sorry. :o) #11020430Michael Kelly April 09, 2014
Nothing left here to say but nice job getting the problems sorted out. The last edits look great. #11020469Elaine Hessler April 10, 2014
Beautiful edits! I don't mind the converging trees at all-I like how they draw your eyes up to the tippy top. Beautiful colors and nice job on the tricky edits. WB can be a toughie.How long ago was this shot? We just got rid of the last bit of snow-yeah! #11020991
Rita K. Connell April 10, 2014
no snow please.... we have had a couple days with sunshine and no rain. Yea!I think you nailed the edit Beth they both look really great. I love the hint of the of the sunset behind the trees #11021063
Peter W. Marks April 10, 2014
Yes a beautiful sky is a beauitiful sky Beth, and I partcularly like the edits. #11021236Teresa H. Hunt April 11, 2014
Beautiful Beth!! #11021833Beth Spencer April 13, 2014
Thanks everyone! I am done with the snow for now! It actually got up to 70 today! I think it is the hottest it has been this year! I am hoping for more days like it!Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Beth Spencer.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!