BetterPhoto Member |
|
What Qualifies One as a "Professional" Photog?
Inquiring as to when an amatuer photographer can actually consider themselves "professional", and what determines this. Is it when an amatuer receives money for a photo?
August 11, 2002
|
|
|
John A. Lind |
|
Pam,
Ask 50 photographers for a definition and you'll get 50 definitions, all different.My definition(s):
A "professional" derives half or more of their income from photography and/or from teaching photography. A "semi-professional" derives less than half of their income from it, but still pursues it as a business to make money. Both professionals and semi-professionals deliberately make photographs, or at least a portion of them, to sell. A "non-professional" derives zero, or so little that it's not done as a business. Any income or profit from it is by chance, not by design. Applying a strict definition to "professional" would qualify anyone who has every been paid more than "cost" for a photograph, even if only once, and even if it were a "prize" from a contest. To me that seems too extreme. "Amateur" has so may connotations about producing works that are something less in quality than professionals produce. Definitely not true. It's why I use the term "non-professional" instead. -- John
August 11, 2002
|
|
|
|
Log in to respond or ask your own question.
|
