BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: Camera Lenses

Susan Patton

New Lens: Fast Vs. Vibration Reduction

Would you rather have a new lens that is faster (2.8) or one with vibration reduction? I am in the market for a mid-range telephoto and I can't decide. I know there are pros and cons to both. Thanks for the input.

To love this question, log in above
April 23, 2006

Samuel Smith

Hello Susan,
I'd rather have the faster glass for low light ... for shooting sports in gymnasiums, and wildlife.
Good luck,
Sam

To love this comment, log in above
April 23, 2006

robert G. Fately

Susan, if I had to choose between the two, I'd agree with Sam - the faster lens will probably serve you better. But of course, it will also be quite a bit heavier and larger, so you need to take that into consideration.
Of course, the Nikkor 70-200 f2.8 has VR as well as a fast aperture, so it's not always an either-or choice.
You don't say what kinds of photography you like - travel/scenery, sports, etc., and that could play a role. For example, to do sports, the faster glass is absolutely a must - both to allow higher shutter speeds and to limit DOF so the player really "pops" against a blurred background. For travel, though, you may want a lighter weight lens, and the fast speed may not be all that big a deal.

To love this comment, log in above
April 23, 2006

Susan Patton

Thanks to both of you for your input. I would say I do more travel/scenery than anything. I also do a few weddings... not as the pro but as a second photographer. Give the photos to the bride and groom as a wedding gift. Fun for me with no pressure! I also like to get out on the water and shoot nature shots, and the VR lens would be helpful. So this is a big decision for me. I don't mind spending the money (I have a Nikon D70 and will probably buy Nikon), but I want to make the right choice. I hadn't considered the increased weight of a faster lens.

To love this comment, log in above
April 23, 2006

Darrell Hetke

Bob and Samuel are both right with their responses. A good rule of thumb is a fast lens for action shots and lowlight and VR for anything over 200mm. You may want to try a Nikkor 50mm f1.8D prime lens for lowlight situations, they are very reasonable in price, many places sell them for around $100.00.

To love this comment, log in above
April 23, 2006

Peter K. Burian

Susan: For your type of photography I would say get a VR lens. Action photographers need fast f/2.8 zooms, but for most others, the Vibration Reduction system is more valuable. And I own both types of lenses, though in a Canon system.
Peter Burian

Editor's Note: Check out Peter Burian's Mastering the Canon EOS Digital Rebels course, which begins May 3rd.

To love this comment, log in above
April 23, 2006

Susan Patton

I think that will be the way I will proceed. I have a problem with camera shake when I get any weight on the lens and I think the VR feature would be valuable. Thank you Peter and everyone who took the time to respond.