 BetterPhoto Member |
What Lens to Buy I love my Nikon F100. The problem is lack of light with my 28-105 and 70-300 lenses. I am constantly adding my flash when I'd rather go without it. I am okay outside; it's when I am inside. I do have to concentrate to stay steady below 1/60 (minor camera shake) So, I am in the market for a fast fixed focal length lens. I like the 180 and the 105 macro. I looked at the 80-200 2.8, but decided it was too cumbersome. My specialty is photographing people, mostly kids. I love to be at a distance (thus the 180), and catch them in action. I also love head shots (again the 180). My question: Is the 180 a reasonable choice, or do you think it is too limited? I'd love to get both the 105 and the 180, which I may once I save up. I've been searching for reviews on both lenses and the 180 comes out with flying colors while the 105 macro is okay. Do you think having both these lenses is redundant? I think I will still use my zoom lenses, but love the faster lens. This was a Christmas present for me and I am still trying to figure out which is the best way to go. What is the reasonable next lens for me? All lenses are Nikon. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
||
|
John A. Lind |
Jamie, Welcome to the world of prime lenses. It also looks as if you have discovered the compromise of the zooms . . . they're typically slower lenses. I have a different, older system. My series of telephoto primes is an 85/2 135/2.8, 200/4, and 300/4.5. I may replace the 200/4 with a 180/2.8 lens because I occasionally miss the speed at that length. This has been a good mix without a 100mm between the 85 and 135. Since you can already get 100mm, albeit a bit slower with a zoom, I'd recommend the 180 based on your comments . . . sounds like you'd use it more. Then drop back and pick up the 105 Macro at a later date. The two focal lengths are not that close together if your question about redundancy is having a 105 and a 180. 200mm is about the limit for hand held due to size and weight combined with the magnification. I use mine hand held, but need to have a good stance and shutter speed of 1/125th minimum, preferably 1/250th. The 300mm is tripod only. -- John
|
|
|
|
||
|
Mark A. Braxton |
Hey Jamie, I've been through the same process that you have in trying to pick out lenses. Personally, I'm biased towards the AF-S 80-200. It is a very sharp lens and it allows you to zoom thus, allowing you to crop your subject. It also will allow you to use the speed of focusing and shutter speed of your F-100. I only have an N70 but, I would like to move up to an F100 or F5 one day and the 80-200 would be my choice. If see a once in a lifetime shot will you get the chance possibly needed to move away or closer needed for a prime lense?
|
|
|
|
||
|
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here
Report this Thread |
||