This is my 2 cents worth: I've heard from many pros that Nikkor makes better optical quality lenses, while Canon have the slight technology edge. Their auto-focusing is faster and quieter. I'm not even sure if Nikon has an Image Stabilizer. One thing to make sure that you do when comparing price is make sure you're getting the same thing: 1) Are the focal length ranges the same? 2) What drives the auto-focusing? Do you get Full Time auto-focusing? 3) Does either lens have low dispersion or chromatic correction elements? 4) Is the aperture setting the same? (this is very important, the difference between a 50mm f/1.8 and f/1.4 is about $700AUD, and f/1.0 is a few thousand) Any other features? Image Stabilizers? Macro Focusing? Any other accessories? Lens hood? Filters? Case? Given the choice again, I would probably still go Canon, though I have been tempted by a friend's extensive range of Nikkor lenses. I think it really comes down to personal taste and nit picking...
November 29, 2000
|