BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: Traditional Film Photography

Photography Question 

Don Curry
 

UV filter


I recently purchased a used Nikkor 75-300mm AF 4.5-5.6 lens. It came with a Cambron UV filter. I'm no expert on UV filters, but I have never heard of this brand. I know the glass in the Nikkor is extreamly good. Will this UV filter reduce the quality?

Thanks,
Don


To love this question, log in above
July 07, 2005

 

David A. Bliss
  I understand the argument that putting a UV filter on a lens helps protect the lens from damage. But, not only are you adding extra glass that the light has to travel through, you are putting a cheap piece of glass on top of really good glass.


To love this comment, log in above
July 27, 2005

 

Debby A. Tabb
  PERSONALLY,
IF YOU SUSPECT A PROBLEM WITH THIS FILTER THEN REPLACE IT .BUT, I WOULD DEFINATELY KEEP ONE ON. I WOULD MUCH RATHER SCRATH THAT FILTER THEN ANY OF MY LENS ANYDAY.
WHEN I PURCHASE A LENS A UV GOES ON THERE BEFORE IT EVER HIT THE CAMERA-IT'S BEEN THAT WAY FOR 30+ YEARS NOW SINCE A ACIDENT THAT CAUSED ME TO LOOSE THE USE OF ONE OF MY FIRST CANON ZOOM LENS.
JUST A THOUGHT
DEBBY
OH AND I WOULD HAVE RATHERED DROPPED THAT STUPID LENS IN THE OCEAN THEN JUST SCRATH IT AND LOOK AT IT SIT THERE UNUSEABLE.BOY THAT MADE ME MAD.


To love this comment, log in above
July 28, 2005

 

David A. Bliss
  A scratch on the front lens element will not effect the photo, unless it is really bad, across the entire lens. I have a lens that has a slight chip in the front element and have never seen any effect in the final photo. The same reason dust on the front element will not show up in a photo, or the fact that you can shoot through chain link with a telephoto.

A scratch in the rear element will render a lens useless.


To love this comment, log in above
July 28, 2005

 

Debby A. Tabb
  yeah David you are right-
I had been chassing some crabs accross a jetty( and I was so focused on getting the shot I wanted,that I slippid in a tide pool and scraped the lens itself against the rock.
It was compleatly useless after that- all the guy at the phototoium said was why didin't you have a filter on there to protect the lens-if not the uv - I should have had a pl.anyway-just one of those spur of the moment things.:-(


To love this comment, log in above
July 28, 2005

 

David A. Bliss
  If you are going to put a filter on your lens to protect it, I suggest a very good one. If you spend $500 to $1000 or more on a lens, and then put a $10 piece of glass on the front...


To love this comment, log in above
July 28, 2005

 

David A. Bliss
  BTW, Debby, I am sorry to hear about your lens. I know what it is like to lose one. My favorite lens popped in half and out of the camera mount when I slipped on ice and dropped my camera.


To love this comment, log in above
July 28, 2005

 

Debby A. Tabb
  WHAT WERE YOU CHASING OVER THE ICE?
IT IS AWFUL WHEN THAT HAPPENS, BUT IT'S THE PRICE WE PAY FOR OUR OBSSESION,IS'NT IT?
I WAS YOUNGER THEN AND IT TOOK QUITE A WHILE TO REPLACE THAT LENS.
I'M NOT QUITE SURE I'M MUCH BETTER WHEN I SEE SOMETHING I WANT.
JUST NOW,I THROW MY ARM UP-WHO CARES IF IT BRAKES JUST NOT THE CAMERA,LOL


To love this comment, log in above
July 28, 2005

 

David A. Bliss
  I was shooting in the mountians here in Colorado in the winter, and was heading back to my car when I hit an ice field. It was like slow motion watching everything happen. I was actually stunned enough from the fall it took me a minute to get to my camera. I was carrying it on the tripod, so everything went crashing down. Even broke a knob on the tripod. Learned a valuable lesson. Always put the camera back in the bag before you start walking, especially over treacherous terrain!


To love this comment, log in above
July 28, 2005

 
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here

Report this Thread