"Moonlight Breezes"

© Lorraine Foster

"Moonlight Breezes"

Uploaded: August 20, 2001

Description

I took this shot with a monolight to increase the shadows where I wanted them, and then tinted it in Photoshop.

Comments

Sue B August 20, 2001

I like this photo a lot. The only thing that bugs me is, not the wisp of hair at the top, but the black between that wisp and the rest of the hair. It looked computer-generated to me. Having said THAT, I still like the photo-clean and uncluttered. #437

Lorraine Foster August 20, 2001

Thanks, Sue,
I did touch up the top of her hair, you caught me. It was because when I took the photo, the background of black only extended to that portion. I had to go back and darken the rest. As you can see, I am very much an amateur, but I am learning more and more every day. I appreciate your comments. Lorraine #653

Glenn Theal August 22, 2001

Hi, Lorraine:

I thought that I would help you fix this photo.

Use the clone tool in PhotoShop to clone the girl's hair into the black space separating the wisp and the rest. Don't go too far back, just go to where that little bump is in the hair. Set the options to normal, aligned, and 100%. Make sure that you use a soft edge brush. Sample directly below the black space in the hair section. You do this by pressing alt (windows) or option (mac) and clicking with your mouse on the section.

This takes practice and patience, so don't give up too quickly.

Finally, use the blur tool as before to touch up any sharp edges.

Cheers,
Glenn #686

Glenn Theal August 22, 2001

Hi, Lorraine:

Another option is to simply erase that wisp of hair and replace it with the black background.

Use the blur tool as noted before to blend the hair into the background.

Cheers,
Glenn #687

Lorraine Foster August 23, 2001

Thanks both to Sue and to Glenn for all of the wonderful advice. I shall try it and put the photo back in tomorrow so we can see the difference. Thanks so much. Lorraine #691

Lorraine Foster August 23, 2001

I erased the wisp of hair with the black background and then did the blur tool. What do you think? Next time, I shall try the clone tool, too. Thanks. Lorraine #697

Mark Antony Franklin September 08, 2001

Lorraine,

I love this portrait - ...one thing no one has commented upon, is how very sexy it is!

Regards

Mark
BTW: I wonder if you could help me. I often want to add tone to some of my B&W prints in Photoshop, but always find that after such manipulation the file size leaps tenfold in size! How can I add tone and still keep the jpeg size down to reasonable levels. Many thanks, in anticipation of your answer. #1022

Lorraine Foster September 09, 2001

Thank you, Mark, for the kind words. In regard to the manipulation of the photograph, it depends a lot on the program that you are using. The easiest one is Photosuite, MGI, Platinum Edition. That is the one I use to tint my photos and color them. I use an Adobe Photoshop LE to blur or burn and dodge the photos. Maybe some people use one, but I find that both work for me. I have never had a problem with the jpeg files doing what you said. I do know you can make the jpeg file photo smaller if that does happen, though. In my programs, I can go to View, and resize. Then, I decide how small I want the jpeg photo, say for instance if it reads 14000 pixels, I divide it by four and end up with the right size jpeg. I am a novice about this stuff, really, I have only had my computer a year and learned this stuff on my own and by trial and error. How about you, Glenn, you have given me such good advice, and so has America. Perhaps they will be able to teach us both more about this. Again, thanks. #1026

Mark Antony Franklin September 09, 2001

Thanks Lorraine,

I try desperately not to really manipulate any of my photo's - under the naive assumption that truly good photo's require little or no digital enhancement(s). Makes me sound like an old fogey (which I'm not, ...yet!). Anyway, I shall have a bit more of a play - as there has been occasion when a subtle colour tone would have added a little something to a B&W image! Thanks again.

Kind regards


Mark #1029

Lorraine Foster September 09, 2001

Mark, I know what you mean about not wanting to change your photos, but before I did photography, I was a portrait artist. I love the enhancing part because I can be as creative as I wish. My goal is to be able to use the artistic knowledge with what I learn in photography to develop an artistic way of taking photos. Thanks for your wonderful comments. Lorraine #1030

To discuss, first log in or sign up (buttons are at top center of page).

Get Constructive Critiques

Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.


 

Did You Know?

Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.

BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.

Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.


 

The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:

I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.

You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.


Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Lorraine Foster.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.