double exposed

Uploaded: April 04, 2002 19:47:22

Description

canon eos 3, 100-300 zoom, cross processed slide film, 125 @ f/8

Comments

Gerda Grice level-classic April 04, 2002

Very interesting. I like this a lot. #4598

Adam Bolt April 04, 2002

This is a the sign of a very good photographer. Pushing the boundries of photography to capture something different and turning a simple snapshot of life into art. This is indeed an excellent photo.
Cheers Adam #6550

Detlef Klahm April 17, 2002

I agree with Adam...pushing your boundaries makes you a better more versatile photographer...also keep the bordom out doing the same old thing....I like her pose...eerie but effective colours,....cool shot! #7057

Staci A. Coblentz April 18, 2002

Note from the photographer: I have enjoyed your comments, thank you very much for responding. you offered the same themes I hear from people who look at my prints in person. to cross-process, you must have plenty of light. I wanted to challenge this for effect. this shot took two tungsten lights, (one at background, one on subject) one large, gold reflector (camera-right)and available light was coming through north and south windows. the lights were turned to low power and the subject was backed into a corner where shadows fell. a true experiment, that, when I do next time, i'll know how to improve it. the theory worked, but the photo turned up less than stellar. oh, and this is a self-portrait. only had 30 minutes---not time to grab a model.

#7063

Detlef Klahm April 18, 2002

You certainly did a fine job Staci...and you are beautiful...I too have done x-proccess many times , more with people been the sub-subject...this shot is pretty cool and thanks for letting us know how you came to shoot this! #7071

Adam Bolt April 18, 2002

Agreed with Detlef... Who needs to pay extra for a model when you photograph so well??? BTW Staci, all the lighting gear is it your own or were you able to use someones studio. You're pretty lucky if it's all your own. Must make it that much easier to try different lighting set ups and experiments.
Cheers Adam #7083

Staci A. Coblentz April 18, 2002

thanks, adam. yes, the gear is all mine, though, be informed, the tungsten lighting was mere household tungsten. I have two portrait monolights, but prefer tungsten or daylight because I feel more comfortable with seeing constant light. can make small adjustments better that way, I guess. probably because the photographic eye learns to see in highlights and shadows. I find reflectors to be very effective. I encourage you to sometime experiment bouncing light with them. carp diem, ~~Staci~~ #7085

To discuss, first log in or sign up (buttons are at top center of page).

Get Constructive Critiques

Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.


 

Did You Know?

Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.

BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.

Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.


 

The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:

I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.

You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.


Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Staci A. Coblentz.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.